Executive and Team Coaching, Leadership Coaching, Mentoring - Strategic Planning - Board Service

 

Dr. Earl R. Smith II
Managing Partner, The Federal Circle
DrSmith@Dr-Smith.com
Dr-Smith.com

Most CEOs have had experiences with building and managing Advisory Boards – many have had one of more at their disposal. But much of that experience has been negative or neutral – in many cases Advisory Boards tend to be mostly window dressing. I have developed a new approach to the design, population and management of these boards – an approach which turns them into very potent business development resources. My book – Amazing Pace: Turbo-Charged Business Development – describes in detail how this is accomplished. In this article, I would like to focus on some of the ancillary benefits that these boards bring. In what follows, I will be talking about Advisory Boards as described in my book – not as they exist in their various and less effective forms.

In addition to driving revenue, Advisory Boards represent a deep pool of experience in growing and managing businesses. Individuals who should appropriately be placed on such Boards for their abilities to help management win more business also tend to have a history of successfully building and managing large companies or organizations. Some of this experience may be in the commercial space while others might have come from the military or senior government service. But the experience is relevant either way. So the first benefit that an Advisory Board brings – long before it ever targets its first piece of business – is the development of a series of mentoring relationships. As the Board begins to settle in, these relationships will begin to develop. The principal beneficiary of this process is the CEO … but other senior members of the Team (particularly the head of business development) also gain support and access to pools of wisdom and experience that it would be difficult for the company to buy outright.

Mentoring relationships are hard to form in this post-modern era. Many CEOs that I come in contact with have never developed one – although all of them have expressed a desire to have mentors. The Advisory Boards offer the opportunity for these mentoring relationships to develop. A Board represents a group of senior executives who are willing to share their experience, judgments and recommendations. This kind of mentoring can be particularly valuable to a CEO who is trying to grow his business but may not have the decades of experience that will be found on the Advisory Board. It has been my experience that each senior team member finds benefit in these mentoring relationships. In addition to the CEO, the head of business development receives invaluable advice; advice which would cost the company tens if not hundreds of thousands of dollars

Learning How To Win: During the first meetings, board members tend to be focused on the management tea and the company organization and resourcing. Remember that they have decided to put their reputations on the line for the company – and their first order of business is to make sure that that reputation will be enhanced rather than degraded. They will want to make sure that the company they have affiliated with, and risked their reputations on, takes the necessary steps both in organization and resourcing that will allow it to take advantage of the opportunities which board members can make available.

The initial series of meetings invariably focuses on the issues of resourcing and organization. Management is pressed to adopt best practices in corporate governance and resourcing. Over time, there tends to be a reduction of expenditures in the purely business development area and an increased emphasis on proposal development, capture team resourcing and management and red teaming. There also tends to be an improved focus in the area of marketing and the targeting of new areas for business development. The Board forces management to focus on the tactical problems of generating revenue. I have watched as management teams – which were addicted to high-level discussions about markets and strategy – were taken out behind the proverbial woodshed. One of the greatest gifts that an Advisory Board can give a CEO is to teach them that business is about doing business – not talking about doing business.

As a result of working with the Board, the management team develops a sharper understanding of what it takes to win, of what is truly excellent and what is merely good – the team raises their standards and takes a giant step in the direction of becoming a truly professional team.

Playing With the Pros: Another ancillary benefit is that, through the Advisory Board, senior management is brought into direct contact with senior decision makers and gate keepers. Board members tutor the senior team on how to approach these senior decision makers – helping them ‘up their game’ to meet much more stringent standards. Often these lessons are forcefully delivered. Advisers can be quite direct in outlining their expectations. They will insist that the company meet the standards – deliver on time and above requirements – and show that team members show themselves to be professionals. I once sat in on a session that a board member had with a Senior Vice President of Business Development. The lesson could be described as ‘How to talk to an Admiral’. Although it had to be repeated several time, eventually the SVP mastered the technique.

Learning to play with the pros is a lesson which can take decades to sink in if a CEO tries to learn it on their own. An Advisory Board can shorten this learning process dramatically – and guide the team members along the path towards professional status.

Forced Evolution: In the company which has reached the high teens in run rate, the CEO may still have maintained the habit of acting as chief-of-everything. In order for the company to grow, this CEO must reinvent himself and serve his creation in an entirely different manner than was adequate during the early stages. So much of the activities which filled a normal day must be offloaded. An Advisory Board can accelerate this process and help the CEO navigate through a stressful time.

The CEO must become the company’s senior business development officer. With the board in place, anywhere from half to three quarters of his time must be cleared for dealing with business development. That means the CEO needs to delegate significant responsibilities particularly in areas which are better served by others. For some CEOs this need can produce real trauma. Board members who have managed the change in themselves are uniquely qualified to help others through the same process.

The Board tends to force this process. In short order, the CEO will delegate all but the highest level of HR supervision, most of the supervision of the accounting and financial controls, issues which surround the day to day physical functioning of the company and the process of maintaining quality control. All of this can seem pretty daunting if the CEO is making it up as he goes along. But with the help of his advisers, his chances of successfully negotiating this process of re-invention and change management go up significantly.

These and other benefits accrue not so much because the advisers are kindly and supportive, but because they do not wish to risk their reputations on a company which is poorly organized, inadequately resourced or unprofessionally managed. The community of interest which evolves is based upon the strong self interest of the advisers and the willingness of the senior management team to learn from them. This is admittedly a major challenge to the team but one, if taken advantage of and overcome, can provide a significant edge over competition. Many of the CEOs I have built boards for have said that these ancillary benefits alone were worth the price of the Board and the increased business is just gravy … albeit very valuable gravy.

© Dr. Earl R. Smith II

~~~~~~~~~~

Related Articles:

~~~~~~~~~~

Share

  7 Responses to “Advisory Boards – Ancillary Benefits”

  1. Dr. Linda Gadbois wrote:

    I’m not sure if I actually understand the question . . . the language is different than I am used to . . . but I feel compelled to comment either way.
    I have a Training and mentoring business, that I also formed a subsidiary called “Innovative Management Services” of which my main specialty is developing brand new approaches to various business situations. I evaluate their business model and methods of practice, and provide the psychological training to open their minds to new outcomes, attitudes and approaches. Most of which are designed to form congruency with their business model, identity and personaity in new and stimulating ways. I find people get stuck in habitual patterns and perceptions in business just like they do in life.
    My subsidiary provides the basis for my parent company, which I develop custom training programs designed to meet their specific needs. They not only benefit each other in a complimentary fashion, but provide my clients with a broader range of services that form consistency in their operations.
    I also help them identify “beliefs” about their profession that have prevented them from seeing new and innovative ways to look at things that will allow them to provide better service or products in a much more efficient manner, lowering their costs, while improving their employee retention rate and over-all participoation of their employees, while simulataneously devloping greater company loyalty.

  2. Larry, Thanks for your response to my question. I appreciated your constructive approach and enjoyed reading it. I have done a lot of work with advisory boards and have even written a book about how to structure and manage them. Your question about proactive advisers is key to the process. The important starting point is purposing the advisory board. The boards that I build are focused on driving the revenue line. Member selection, board management and compensation are all aligned to support that mission. Many times I need to dismantle an existing board that has become unproductive mostly because of a lack of focus before building a new one. When they work, they truly do turbo-charge business development.

    Regards,

    Dr. Earl R. Smith II
    DrSmith@Dr-Smith.com

  3. Larry MacDonald wrote:

    Advisory boards are most valuable to me when the basic guidelines of crowdsourcing are incorporated: diversity, independence, and a particular kind of decentralization. In my experience, when you ask a well chosen group about an issue or plan, each person will have advice to offer and most interestingly, no two people will tend to offer advice on similar points. In other words, they all make suggestions about different elements, so you need to have a large enough group to cover a multitude of issues. Many advisors are great at responding and evaluating, but few are great at being proactive and noticing what is missing. Do others find this to be the case?

  4. Ed Dodds wrote;

    What is curious to me is that the kind of orgs which benefit the most (local NPOs) are the ones to publicize openings the least. Second, donors don’t seem the least inclined to hold them accountable for not taking advantage of this pool of experience. 1.5 million US NPOs — each with 10 to 20 board members — busily reinventing wheels…

  5. Todd Glassey wrote:

    Yes Dr. Smith,
    Good reply Sir and I believe your model is right for how to structure a board (trust me I have similar structures in use for two of my corporation boards and all of my Trust and Foundation advisory boards). But what I was trying to get you to do is to tell the list what that has to do with PE and raising it. Let me amplify – your posting is reasonable here (in the PE Capital WG) because you are posting this about “teaching people basic business dynamics of how to structure your governance team to insure that the team is capable of meeting any requirements that the business endeavor may face”… which you are asserting is a component of successful capitalization.

    FWIW – I totally agree but to differentiate this from other posts which are spamish I would use something like a title which contained “Information about Businesses which successfully raise PE” and then start into your commentary on how the Book helps entrepreneur’s chances of successfully fund their efforts.

    Just my two cents.

    Todd Glassey

  6. Todd, thanks for the question. Investors make their decision by taking into consideration a wide range of issues. Most do not focus only on the value proposition and the senior team. One of the issues they consider is the strength of reputation and commitment of other, senior and high visibility players. I have had investors tell me that the presence of the kind of board I describe in my book is seen as an asset which increases the company’s value. Their reasoning is that 1) companies that can attract people who can impact senior decision makers with the pro-active kinds of commitments required by the advisory boards are more interesting to them because such people would not associate with companies that might damage their reputation, 2) advisers on these boards are dedicated to helping the company gain access to high-level decision makers (an access that most companies in their class would not have, 3) advisers act as mentors to the senior team – reducing the change that they will make bad decisions, 4) the formation of such a pro-active advisory board will have subjected the business plan, value proposition, projections, strategic and tactical plans to the equivalent of a red-team review by a highly qualified panel of experts in the space, and 4) advisers on this type of board tend to be viewed as part of the senior management team – this, along with a correctly designed and populated board of directors, helps give potential investors comfort. Companies that focus on these benefits will have a better chance of successfully arranging funding. Dr. Smith

  7. Todd Glassey wrote:

    Dr. Smith – again what does your book specifically have to do with raising venture or private equity?

    Todd

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

   

Bad Behavior has blocked 1062 access attempts in the last 7 days.